logoalt Hacker News

bandramitoday at 11:11 AM5 repliesview on HN

We've re-invented GNU screen in the most inefficient way imaginable


Replies

Toutouxctoday at 12:31 PM

Well it DOES have less storage than a Nomad (hence lame), but this way you don't need to pay for a public IP address, or for a VPS to run Wireguard on, or for a commercial VPN solution, and then install a terminal emulator on your phone and set up SSH keys.

ebiestertoday at 3:17 PM

People tried reinventing terminals, SSH, and tmux for phones. It's a pretty terrible experience using your thumbs. And it takes significant know-how to set up.

And in modern stacks, it almost necessitates a man in the middle - tailscale is common but it's still a central provider. So is it really the most inefficient way possible?

ryanmcltoday at 1:04 PM

Fair point technically, but I think the value proposition isn't the persistent session, rathere it's the abstraction layer. Screen/tmux assumes you know what commands to run. This assumes you know what outcome you want. For someone like me who came to coding late and doesn't have 20 years of muscle memory with terminal tools, the inefficiency in transport is more than offset by the efficiency in intent. Different tools for different people.

block_daggertoday at 11:37 AM

That’s not at all how this works. Commands are relayed through Anthropic’s servers with a client polling mechanism.

show 2 replies
petesergeanttoday at 12:29 PM

I’m running the agent in tmux in a colo. When I’m at a computer I use that, when I’m on the go the RC app is more convenient