logoalt Hacker News

lxgryesterday at 12:25 PM2 repliesview on HN

> No other reason than because we can!

Then maybe your scientists should spend some time to stop and consider whether they should ;)

But seriously, I'd just limit this to one option on the selection side, even if you continue supporting more than that at the protocol level for cryptographic agility.


Replies

fc417fc802yesterday at 6:46 PM

I don't see the issue. "Anything that openssl actively supports" plus providing a default seems like an extremely reasonable stance to take.

show 2 replies
Benderyesterday at 2:04 PM

I would rather avoid cipher fixation. Give me thousands of protocol / cipher / mac / mode combinations. Fixation only benefits nations wanting to crack something.

show 2 replies