logoalt Hacker News

MeetingsBrowseryesterday at 10:37 PM4 repliesview on HN

If LLMs really multiply productivity, why would you fire people and handicap the boost?

I have 100 people that can now do the work of 200 people thanks to a new tool.

How is the logical response to fire half of them and bring my productivity back to where it was before?


Replies

missedthecuetoday at 2:48 AM

Because there isn't an unlimited amount of productive work to be done. Sure, a bowling ball factory in a world that demands unlimited bowling balls should take the productivity multiplier AND retain the employees, because they ought to make all the bowling balls they possibly can.

But CashApp jira tickets are not a bowling ball factory in a world with unlimited bowling ball demand. At a certain point, you're just paying people to sit around, or even worse, pretend they're busy.

show 1 reply
jpdbyesterday at 11:31 PM

> If LLMs really multiply productivity, why would you fire people and handicap the boost?

Presumably, because some of these areas are cost centers versus profit generating.

jibeyesterday at 11:21 PM

He explains the rationale, smaller teams work faster.

we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly.

show 1 reply
themgtyesterday at 10:57 PM

Demand inelasticity.

show 1 reply