logoalt Hacker News

SoftTalkeryesterday at 4:09 PM3 repliesview on HN

It's going to be cheaper for municipalites to have group insurance for this (or self-insure) than to have to pay the police enough that they can afford their own insurance.


Replies

JoshTriplettyesterday at 5:07 PM

The whole point of requiring individual insurance is precisely that insurance will be too expensive for people who are demonstrably high risk in that role, and less expensive for people who are low risk.

show 1 reply
Zigurdyesterday at 5:21 PM

If it's uninsurable in the private market, that's a hint. Maybe they could pledge the pension fund.

mothballedyesterday at 4:13 PM

Ultimately it's the civil authorities and upper brass that want these intrusions. The insurance issue is easily worked around by hiring green recruits at a very high "bonus" to be used as basically burner employees to burn through their insurance and do the illegal stuff under their identity.

It has to be a criminal thing because the top brass and civil servants need RICO like prosecution and tossed in jail along with the guy who gets the insurance ding.

show 1 reply