logoalt Hacker News

kristjanssonyesterday at 5:08 PM1 replyview on HN

> Anthropic wanted those sweet, sweet, taxpayer dollars

The sold services to a willing counterparty at mutually agreed upon terms. And now the other side of that deal has recalled that they're Twelve and You're Not My Real Mom You Can't Tell Me What To Do, and so wishes they had agreed to different terms and is throwing a tantrum to attempt to force a change.

And that's Anthropic's fault? That's a risk they should have predicted?


Replies

TimorousBestieyesterday at 6:11 PM

> The sold services to a willing counterparty at mutually agreed upon terms.

Yeah, and the legal environment that contract was written in, which both parties were aware of during negotiation, defines the means by which those terms can be changed.

> And that's Anthropic's fault? That's a risk they should have predicted?

It is deeply funny to me to imagine that an AI company doing inference at an unprecedented scale could not see this coming.

Go ask Claude how usgov should act if a contractor preemptively refuses to deliver. What are the top five tools they could use to demand compliance?

show 1 reply