logoalt Hacker News

invaderyesterday at 12:27 PM4 repliesview on HN

However, to be fair, Desert Storm hasn't resulted in regime change. The Coalition bombed the shit out of the Iraqi army, but never committed to the ground operation deep inside Iraq. And Saddam's regime survived until the next war.

That alone hints that it is very hard to bring a dictatorship down with just aerial attacks - the ground component is also essential. Something tells me it is going to be the same here.

Only a land operation or a total collapse of the government, with the armed police and military joining the opposition, can topple the Iranian regime.


Replies

datsci_est_2015yesterday at 8:58 PM

> That alone hints that it is very hard to bring a dictatorship down with just aerial attacks.

This has been painfully obvious since aerial bombing became possible, but we’ve had so many generals and executives obsessed with the concept that it continues to be a core doctrine, like Kissinger and Curtis LeMay, neither of for whom I have anything but deep contempt.

platinumradyesterday at 5:53 PM

Was Saddam's Iraq (post Desert Storm when he no longer had the ability to wage offensive war) really that bad compared to what came after?

show 2 replies
AbstractH24yesterday at 12:58 PM

Counterexanple would be Venezuela

show 2 replies