logoalt Hacker News

gyomuyesterday at 2:13 PM8 repliesview on HN

Yeah, it’s pretty wild. Even pg is tweeting stuff like

“An experienced programmer told me he's now using AI to generate a thousand lines of code an hour.“

https://x.com/paulg/status/2026739899936944495

Like if you had told pg to his face in (pre AI) office hours “I’m producing a thousand lines of code an hour”, I’m pretty sure he’d have laughed and pointed out how pointless that metric was?


Replies

ruszkiyesterday at 5:50 PM

I don't understand how some people decide here, who the good programmers are. A lot of people reminded me a guy from West Palm Beach, who votes on elections solely on the principle of who has more "fame". Paul Graham is famous for sure (at least in HN circles), but I never considered him an exceptional or good programmer at all. So I always interpreted his words with a hefty amount of grain of salt. And sometimes some comments have a list of "good" coders, then half of them is like these famous, but not good ones.

show 1 reply
medi8ryesterday at 2:28 PM

He is a Lisper too, making it more ironic. Lisp the power to heavily reduce cruft by heavy customization with macros.

show 2 replies
manoDevyesterday at 3:13 PM

They need to keep the musical chairs going.

ameliusyesterday at 2:38 PM

Technical debt is increasing by 1,000 lines an hour.

lukanyesterday at 8:45 PM

Hm, I do not read the statement as a hyped "this is how everyone should write code now" rather as a statement of fact. "A experienced programmer he knows uses LLMs to generate thounds LOC/h". That does not say whether those lines will actually be shipped anywhere or just exist for testing purposes/prototyping.

steve1977yesterday at 3:45 PM

We all know that a thousand parentheses would be better metric.

ElProlactinyesterday at 2:21 PM

Enshittification comes for us all

wiseowiseyesterday at 2:32 PM

It’s all virtual virtue signaling. If you were to say this shit in the office, you’d be walked out pretty fast.

show 2 replies