> I said "attacked/invaded", not "had some fistfights at the border"

Disputed border region. Used military force to intervene. That's an attack.

> Could we set the standard at "at least one piece of military equipment fired on people"?

Why not tens of soldiers killed? (And on what planet do "the 4th (Highland) Motorised Infantry and 6th (Highland) Mechanised Infantry Divisions" of the PLA not contain military equipment?)

> we're comparing this to the USA and Israel's military record over the last 40 years

No, you are. The list I stated was China, Russia and America. You're trying to argue that China upholds the rules-based international order around respecting sovereign borders. That would be news in Taipei.