If someone makes a decision base on wrong information, what’s to blame: the informations he got or his judgement ability?

Two dimensions to interpret this:

- article author judgement on what’s healthy based solely on its personal nutritional knowledge at the moment.

- the judgement of his decision, solely on the details of this post.

IMHO the only fault here is to omit more information he was basing his decision. But reading between the lines: he repeat being "hungry" but never saying "staving". That’s a huge difference: being hungry isn’t a health hasard.