logoalt Hacker News

fhd2yesterday at 6:57 PM3 repliesview on HN

Even if somebody shows you what they've built with it, you're none the wiser. All you'll know is that it seemingly works well enough for a greenfield project.

The jury is still very far out on how agentic development affects mid/long term speed and quality. Those feedback cycles are measured in years, not weeks. If we bother to measure at all.

People in our field generally don't do what they know works, because by and large, nobody really knows, beyond personal experiences, and I guess a critical mass doesn't even really care. We do what we believe works. Programming is a pop culture.


Replies

suzzer99yesterday at 9:53 PM

Does good design up front matter as much if an AI can refactor in a few hours something that would take a good developer a month? Refactoring is one of those tasks that's tedious, and too non-trivial for automation, but seems perfect for an AI. Especially if you already have all the tests.

show 3 replies
echelonyesterday at 8:21 PM

I'm using Claude Code (loving it) and haven't dipped into the agentic parallel worker stuff yet.

Where does one get started?

How do you manage multiple agents working in parallel on a single project? Surely not the same working directory tree, right? Copies? Different branches / PRs?

You can't use your Claude Code login and have to pay API prices, right? How expensive does it get?

show 2 replies
briantakitayesterday at 8:08 PM

I am now releasing software for projects that have spent years on the back-burner. From my perspective, agent loops have been a success. It makes the impractical pipe-dream doable.

show 2 replies