logoalt Hacker News

bryanlarsenlast Monday at 9:04 PM4 repliesview on HN

I would have preferred permanent standard time to permanent daylight time. But I accept I'm in the minority, and even permanent daylight time is far superior to changing clocks twice a year.


Replies

sampoyesterday at 2:10 PM

> and even permanent daylight time is far superior to changing clocks twice a year

This paper implies that for health, permanent standard time would be best, and permanent DST would be the worst. And even keeping the current clock-shifting would be better than permanent DST.

"The combination of DST and winter would therefore make the differences between body clocks and the social clock even worse and would negatively affect our health even more."

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/07487304198541...

jonny_ehlast Monday at 9:14 PM

It's "standard" for a reason. Humanity settled on these numbers long ago because they work best. It boggles my mind why anyone would choose otherwise since what we do at any given hour is arbitrary.

show 14 replies
WalterGRlast Monday at 9:18 PM

> I would have preferred permanent standard time to permanent daylight time.

Do you have children?

In past HN threads, the preference largely comes down to whether you have children (and want more early morning light for safer trips to school) or not.

show 6 replies
awakeasleepyesterday at 2:45 PM

> even permanent daylight time is far superior to changing clocks twice a year

God bless you for keeping that top of mind. So many people miss the forest for the trees here.