logoalt Hacker News

allknowingfroglast Monday at 11:13 PM6 repliesview on HN

Well, I'm not one of those people. I like waking up with the sun and driving to work in the daylight. The idea that DST solves anything absolutely blows my mind. If you want the ability to start your work day earlier and end it earlier, that seems like a worker protection bill that needs to be passed. DST is the kludgiest kludge that ever kludged.


Replies

alpinismelast Monday at 11:42 PM

Where I live June sunrise (with DST) is 5:11am and sunset is 8:21pm (a city on the American east coast). I just can’t imagine a majority of people would want 4:11 rising and 7:21 setting.

show 1 reply
davidwlast Monday at 11:39 PM

> If you want the ability to start your work day earlier and end it earlier, that seems like a worker protection bill that needs to be passed.

I don't think that's very realistic though is it? School times are fixed and that anchors a lot of families to those specific times, and businesses tend to have set hours.

Changing the time to give people more light in the evening frees up a bunch of people to enjoy some sunlight without making it a whole fight to have different hours at work.

show 1 reply
duskdozeryesterday at 5:41 AM

It's the obvious real solution that sidesteps all the personal-preference-driven claims on what option is "objectively" better/healthier/whatever, but corporate society isn't ready for it I guess

at_compile_timelast Monday at 11:47 PM

>If you want the ability to start your work day earlier and end it earlier, that seems like a worker protection bill that needs to be passed.

If that's what passes for aspiration these days then the labour movement truly is dead.

show 1 reply
Mumpsyesterday at 3:41 PM

Isn't the converse then equally appropriate?

Move to DST and if you want the ability to start your day later and end later, [...].

sjkoelleyesterday at 12:35 AM

yeah im curious if people will end up liking it. sucks from my perspective.