logoalt Hacker News

Mystery-Machineyesterday at 12:55 PM4 repliesview on HN

Censorship is not a solution. Instead, companies, whose messages are misleading, could pay a fine for their misleading message. Otherwise, you end up in 1984...sorry, I mistyped "UK in 2026".


Replies

youngNedyesterday at 12:59 PM

No.

You avoid having companies, who can swallow the bill, making whatever claims they like without having to much to worry about other than a slap on the wrist - Their claims are already out. J&J, P&G, Unilever et al - you may trust them to do the right thing, i don't.

show 2 replies
pjc50yesterday at 1:13 PM

I'd be cool fining Meta 1% of global revenue for every fraudulent ad on their platform.

show 1 reply
tw04yesterday at 12:58 PM

A fine doesn’t undo a lie that’s already made it around the world.

Although given Brexit I’d question how useful the ASA actually is. It seems Russian funded politicians were free to spew endless lies at the average citizen with no repercussions.

show 1 reply
direwolf20yesterday at 2:19 PM

That's literally censorship though. If you get fined for saying a thing, you are being censored.

show 2 replies