logoalt Hacker News

youngNedyesterday at 1:40 PM3 repliesview on HN

> you can see the reasoning here

you can see what mullvad, the company selling a product here, say what the reasoning was.

As i say, smacks of marketing campaign. Did clearcast give the marketing team a gift, or did the marketing team invent it? All we have is Mullvads word, but my word they have been running an extensive campaign in london for a while now.

Step 1: cryptically warn people that their rights are under attack.

Step 2: tell people that you have been banned from saying any more.

Step 3: Conveniently make no mention of the fact that this highly controversial 'banned' ad is absolutely watchable, in the UK, on youtube, with links to it from traditional media adverts.


Replies

MrCzaryesterday at 1:56 PM

You are being pedantic.

> Step 1: cryptically warn people that their rights are under attack.

They are, UK is heavy surveillance, there is an article on Wikipedia dedicated just to this subject. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_surveillance_in_the_Unite...

> Step 2: tell people that you have been banned from saying any more.

They said their ad is "banned from TV" because they offer a way to circumvent internet surveillance.

> Step 3: Conveniently make no mention of the fact that this highly controversial 'banned' ad is absolutely watchable, in the UK, on youtube, with links to it from traditional media adverts.

Because it is about TV... what does YouTube have to do with this? It says on the damn Ad "Banned on TV".

show 2 replies
Hnrobert42yesterday at 2:03 PM

It's smacks of a marketing campaign because...it is a marketing campaign.