logoalt Hacker News

hereme888yesterday at 8:35 PM9 repliesview on HN

For the prospects of the freedom and subsequent prosperity of the oppressed Iranian people, peace in the Middle East, and safety of the commercial shipping routes, I fully approve my tax dollars to the matter.


Replies

threetonesunyesterday at 8:56 PM

OK, I don't. I wonder if we could set up some sort of legislative system that could debate this on our behalf and make a reasonable plan that accounts for our differing viewpoints.

show 1 reply
lukas099yesterday at 9:22 PM

Do you believe that those goals will be achieved? Given the historical track record of these kinds of interventions, I do not.

nprzyesterday at 8:57 PM

Do you really believe killing 175 children[0] will bring peace and prosperity to the Iranian people?

[0]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/01/world/middleeast/girls-sc...

show 1 reply
nitwit005yesterday at 10:34 PM

It's genuinely difficult to see this sort of claim as being an honest statement, given that everyone knows the outcome with Afghanistan and Iraq.

mekdoonggiyesterday at 8:51 PM

Would you still approve if the cost is 20x, the Iranian people are worse off, and the shipping routes and Middle East are dramatically less safe due to drones?

Because that is a realistic possibility.

show 1 reply
carefulfungiyesterday at 9:16 PM

Iraq. Afghanistan. Iraq, again. Syria. Libya. Iran. Iran, again. Yeah - this is totally gonna work this time.

show 2 replies
leosanchezyesterday at 8:48 PM

For Pakistanis as well ?

show 1 reply
LAC-Techyesterday at 8:49 PM

That is an unrealistic goal.

Likely the actual goal, as dictated by Israel and the Jewish Lobby in the US, is to destabilise Iran long term in a sort of Syria situation, so they cannot threaten Israeli hegemony in the region.

Remember even a non Islamic Iran is still a threat to Israeli power if it remains unified and intact.

show 1 reply
danny_codesyesterday at 8:41 PM

Yeah that’s the likely outcome given our track record /s

show 1 reply