logoalt Hacker News

bitcuriousyesterday at 8:38 PM4 repliesview on HN

More accurately, Israel was going to attack Iran, and US intelligence stated that Iranian retaliation planning was to target US forces, along with most gulf nations and shipping lanes, so US preempted that retaliation.


Replies

Jtsummersyesterday at 9:20 PM

If the retaliation was preempted they wouldn't have retaliated, but they have. What the US actually did was provide justification for the retaliation against US bases in the region by joining in the opening salvo.

anigbrowlyesterday at 10:39 PM

Preempting Israel seems like it would have been a much smarter strategy.

tw-20260303-001yesterday at 9:06 PM

Maybe you haven't noticed but they have not preempted anything.

bjourneyesterday at 9:14 PM

That's quite a preemptive form of preemption! Was the US intelligence from the same source that stated that Iraq was acquiring "yellowcake" from Niger?