I said you can't say whatever you want without consequence. Giving the example of shouting fire.
You responded pointing out it has to be believable, ie real harm done.
I brought it back full circle showing that adverts can 'lie' if it isn't believable.
I am pointing out you are reinforcing my original point, not detracting from it.
Oh okay that's the misunderstanding. I thought you were trying to rebut my comment. My bad.