>You may distribute the software or any part of its source code only if you do so free of charge for non-commercial purposes.
Semantic arguments over what "FOSS" means aside, for most people, calling it "not FOSS" probably makes them more confused than if you just said "it's FOSS", even if the latter might not be technically correct.
alt Hacker News
>You may distribute the software or any part of its source code only if you do so free of charge for non-commercial purposes.
Semantic arguments over what "FOSS" means aside, for most people, calling it "not FOSS" probably makes them more confused than if you just said "it's FOSS", even if the latter might not be technically correct.