logoalt Hacker News

myrmidonyesterday at 3:02 PM2 repliesview on HN

I'll turn this around: Do you think it is acceptable for policymakers, lawmakers or people involved in such a process to reap profits more or less directly with (partially non-public) knowledge they've acquired?

Because I think not. And I feel pretty strongly about this. The conflict of interest is so glaringly obvious that it should be completely self-evident why every voter should want to prevent, ban and punish any such action.

I feel that anyone involved in this tariff insurance business should be able to prove without a shadow of doubt that they had no political insider knowledge about the whole thing, and I'm extremely skeptical that this is the case (just from the pople involved alone!).


Replies

irishcoffeeyesterday at 3:29 PM

You mean these policymakers?

“ House kills effort to release all congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-kills-effort...

show 1 reply
NetMageSCWyesterday at 4:01 PM

>with (partially non-public) knowledge they've acquired

What partially non-public information did he have? Be specific.

show 1 reply