logoalt Hacker News

godelskiyesterday at 9:14 PM6 repliesview on HN

Why ask Anthropic?

Why not build on something better like Matrix? Or Signal?[0] Or even Keybase?

I really do agree we need to move away from Slack and Discord, but I'm also very confused why the call to action is to Anthropic. IMO we should really be pushing for open systems so that nobody can take it from us. Otherwise we repeat the cycle again and again. There's some good protocols to start on. I'd also say this is a good reason to make sure that the things you work on are hackable. It's how we combine different domains of expertise.

[0] see the Molly project, you don't have to use Signal's servers


Replies

georgewfraseryesterday at 9:21 PM

Claude-in-Slack is a big enough feature to overcome the slack-connect network effect. Openness is absolutely key! I wrote this post because I hoped that if Anthropic is already planning to do this I might be able to influence them to make open-data part of the plan. But openness by itself isn't a big enough feature to get users.

show 1 reply
a3wyesterday at 9:37 PM

They seem to not want a messenger, they want a multiuser-first prompt.

jinushauntoday at 1:08 AM

Did you read the article? It’s not a crazy ask. They want multi-user Claude sessions. But what stops the humans from talking to each other? Boom! You suddenly have Slack.

KaiserProyesterday at 10:36 PM

> something better like Matrix

matrix isn't fun.

The other thing that I would gently point out is that anthropic's uptime is pretty atrocious

show 1 reply
j45yesterday at 9:17 PM

Has Matrix improved the ease of use for folks to use it independently?

Mattermost, Rocketchat and others have first class packaging for quick and easy roll out.

show 1 reply