logoalt Hacker News

HarHarVeryFunnyyesterday at 3:27 PM5 repliesview on HN

What would be the benefit? You don't need a 10GHz processor to browse the web, or edit a spreadsheet, and in any case things like that are already multi-threaded.

The current direction of adding more cores makes more sense, since this is really what CPU intensive programs generally need - more parallelism.


Replies

michaeltyesterday at 5:31 PM

Because someone decided to write all the software in javascript and python, which don't benefit from the added cores.

nurettinyesterday at 4:23 PM

Single core speed is absolutely a thing that is needed and preferred to multicore. That's why we have avx, amx, etc.

show 1 reply
vaylianyesterday at 4:49 PM

You technically don't even need a 300MHz processor for the use cases that you name. But Intel and others kept developing faster CPUs anyway.

moffkalastyesterday at 5:25 PM

For parallelism we already have SIMD units like AVX and well... GPUs. CPUs need higher single thread speeds for tasks that simply cannot make effective use of it.

hulituyesterday at 7:30 PM

> You don't need a 10GHz processor to browse the web, or edit a spreadsheet,

To browse the web is debatable. But for svchost.exe, Teams, Office 365 and Notepad, you definitely need one. /s

Programming is a lost art.