I know all press is good press... but there are limits.
If it feels like Grammarly does not respect your right to digital sovereignty, it is because it does not.
The real issue seems more about transparency and consent around how the models are trained and how author personas are being used
It almost seems like this whole feature is designed to invite law suits.
Seems pretty likely usage of Grammarly's core product has cratered in the past few years. Not totally hard to imagine one of the big AI labs paying their legal fees in exchange for putting this out there and kick starting the legal process on some of these issues.