logoalt Hacker News

nomdeptoday at 6:28 PM5 repliesview on HN

I saw the data. They have replaced coal plants with gas plants. Mostly imported gas. Why do Europeans hate the idea of safe nuclear plants though?

https://ember-energy.org/data/electricity-data-explorer/?cha...


Replies

pollorollotoday at 7:19 PM

While nuclear was cost competitive a decade ago, it turns out that is no longer the case [0].

As of 2025, the cheapest levelized cost of energy is solar ($58), onshore wind ($61), and gas combined ($78).

Although the data is US-based, European prices likely follow a similar pattern.

[0] https://www.lazard.com/media/5tlbhyla/lazards-lcoeplus-june-...

elAhmotoday at 6:50 PM

Nuclear has bad branding.

amaitoday at 6:56 PM

Because there is no place for nuclear waste in Europe? Especially not on smaller islands like Ireland. Why do Americans hate the idea of cheap renewable energy?

dyauspitrtoday at 6:54 PM

30 years of anti nuclear propaganda. They should all be like France, what a dream to have almost all of your electricity coming from a stable, essentially perpetual source.

runarbergtoday at 6:54 PM

I think it is unfair to specify safe here, as probably all nuclear powerplants are considered safe until they are not, including Fukushima. But plenty of European countries are either building or planing nuclear new nuclear power reactors, and Finland just opened a new reactor in 2023.

But the simple matter is thought that the economics of nuclear power simply are not delivering. They are expensive and slow to build, while at the same time wind (particularly off shore wind) and solar are getting cheaper and easier to build every year (or month even). Germany also stands out as a success story of nuclear phase-out, that by replacing these expensive to run nuclear power plant has offered the economic wiggle room to phase in renewables a lot faster then otherwise.