alt Hacker NewsIt does and that is exactly why the article's title is sensationalized.
The title is refuting a strawman argument that wasn't actually made, and that the article itself doesn't claim was made.
It does and that is exactly why the article's title is sensationalized.
The title is refuting a strawman argument that wasn't actually made, and that the article itself doesn't claim was made.
> The title is refuting a strawman argument that wasn't actually made
The argument was literally made in Forbes. It's linked to. What are you on about?
Is there something I'm missing here?