As proven a few times, it doesn't matter if committee decides to break something if compiler vendors aren't on board with what is being broken.
There is still this disconnection on how languages under ISO process work in the industry.
The C++ standards committee’s antiquated reliance on compiler “vendors” holds it back. They should adopt maintenance of clang and bless it as the reference compiler.
The C++ standards committee’s antiquated reliance on compiler “vendors” holds it back. They should adopt maintenance of clang and bless it as the reference compiler.