The CEO does not say it’s a horrible idea. The interviewers say that. CEO says it’s “brilliant idea”.

And then of course he continues (although won't make for a good social media rage point so understandable you didn't provide full context):

> Well, I actually think it's a brilliant idea if it can be done in an educational way that's legal.

> no free Robux, no free prizes, just a game called the dress to impress predictor where it's not like trying to get kids money or anything like that.

Still, probably what he sees in his mind is "more money yay" as always, he is a CEO of a for-profit company, that's what they do. But still felt disingenuous not to include the full context, doesn't even make it "that much better", he still seems like a scumbag with it.