logoalt Hacker News

semiquaveryesterday at 7:09 PM1 replyview on HN

If you’re referring to Thaler v. Perlmutter, that is not binding precedent nationwide, only in courts under the D.C. Circuit. And it only applies to “pure” AI-generated works; it did not address AI-assisted works, which seem very likely to be copyrightable.


Replies

bananamogulyesterday at 7:37 PM

Though here, the purpose is still served.

If I want to clone some GPL clone into a MIT license, if it ends up in the public domain because it can't be copyrighted, what do I care? I've still got the code I want without the GPL.