This is a misreading of the law. Court cases say that AI cannot own copyright, not that AI output cannot be copyrighted.
No, according to everything I've read before, the parent post was correct and you're not. This article clearly says "art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law":
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-co...
alt Hacker News
No, according to everything I've read before, the parent post was correct and you're not. This article clearly says "art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law":
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-co...