logoalt Hacker News

hungryhobbitlast Thursday at 10:50 PM9 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

shitloadofbookslast Thursday at 11:17 PM

I certainly wouldn't use a compiler that "screws up" 1% of the time; that's the perfect amount where it's extremely common where everything I use it for will have major issues but also so laborious to find amongst the 99% of correct output that I might as well not use it in the first place.

Which is ironically, the exact case those of us who don't find LLM-assisted coding "worth it" make.

show 1 reply
Bridged7756yesterday at 5:14 AM

You're not any better my friend. Name calling and straw man fallacies make a far worse point, if any, that that commenter made.

bigfishrunninglast Thursday at 11:22 PM

If they only screwed up 1% of the time, they'd be as good as the LinkedIn hype men want you to believe. They're far far worse then that in reality

pocksuppetyesterday at 4:10 AM

Where's the evidence of the productivity, or does it just feel productive? https://minutes.substack.com/p/tool-shaped-objects

tomhowyesterday at 9:42 AM

Please don't reply to a bad comment with another bad comment.

When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

krapplast Thursday at 10:54 PM

LLMs screw up far more than 1% of the time. They screw up routinely, far more than a professionally trained human would, and in ways that would have said human declared mentally ill.

komali2yesterday at 2:13 AM

> enabling programmers around the world to be far more productive

I know a lot of us feel this way, but why isn't there more evidence of it than our feelings? Where's the explosion of FOSS projects and businesses? And why do studies keep coming out showing decreased productivity? Why aren't there oodles of studies showing increases of productivity?

I like kicking back and letting claude do my job but I've yet to see evidence of this increased productivity. Objectively speaking, "I" seem to be "writing" the same amount of code as I was before, just with less cognitive effort.

show 2 replies
b00ty4breakfastlast Thursday at 11:28 PM

not questioning the cost of adopting new tech is so foolish it boggles my mind that so many nominally intelligent people just close their eyes and take a bite without wondering whether that's really fudge on their sundae or something fecal.

Pure ideology, as a certain sniffing slav would say

xigoiyesterday at 7:13 AM

FTFY: “There’s this incredible new technology that allows evil megacorporations to get richer and control the world while destroying the beauty of the Web.”