How do you explain the data contradicting this? I believe that your bank did this but the data seems to show otherwise.
The data can show anything you want, this is a historical question and there the order of things matters more than anything. If A came before B then B can not have influenced A.
The data can show anything you want, this is a historical question and there the order of things matters more than anything. If A came before B then B can not have influenced A.