> if we replace the real coding experience learning curve with LLMs from day one.

People will learn different things. They will still learn. Most developers I've hired over the years do not know assembly. Many do not know a low-level language like C. That is a downside if they need to write assembly, but most of them never do (and incidentally, Opus knows x86 assembly better than me, knows gdb better than me; it's still not good at writing large assembly programs). It does not make them worse developers in most respects, and by the time they have 30 years experience the things they learn instead will likely be far more useful than many of the things I've spent years learning.

> But every tool, without an exception, provides replicable results.

This is just sheer nonsense, and if you genuinely believe this, it suggests to me a lack of exposure to the real world.