logoalt Hacker News

isbvhodnvemrwvnlast Saturday at 10:32 PM3 repliesview on HN

It's significantly more difficult to secure random clis than those apis. All llm tools today bypass their ignore files by running commands their harness can't control.


Replies

tptaceklast Saturday at 11:33 PM

I'm fuzzy when we're talking about what makes an LLM work best because I'm not really an expert. But, on this question of securing/constraining CLIs and APIs? No. It is not easier to secure an MCP than it is a CLI. Constraining a CLI is a very old problem, one security teams have been solving for at least 2 decades. Securing MCPs is an open problem. I'll take the CLI every time.

krzykyesterday at 1:13 PM

I don't think so. There is no MCP standard for authentication, our infosec banned MCP because of that.

show 1 reply
otabdeveloper4yesterday at 9:18 AM

Just use a custom PATH and run in a chroot jail.

CLI sandboxing is a solved problem compared to whatever MCP is.