logoalt Hacker News

karlgkkyesterday at 11:13 AM4 repliesview on HN

> Obviously, it's not for protecting children

Frankly, this is false. There's a lot of well intentioned people writing these laws and pushing for them.

> Obviously, it's a technocratic trojan horse for increasing surveillance capabilities on digital systems.

However, it is also this.

And that's not a tradeoff I think we should make as a society.


Replies

sanderjdyesterday at 3:21 PM

Well said. Yeah. Well intentioned things can still result in bad outcomes.

buckle8017yesterday at 3:20 PM

[flagged]

PeterStueryesterday at 3:18 PM

"well intentioned people"

I believe the standard nomenclature is "useful idiots".

givinguflacyesterday at 1:04 PM

> There's a lot of well intentioned people writing these laws and pushing for them.

No, there absolutely are not. There are Meta et al and their international lobbyists, pushing copy-paste bills. Anyone pearl clutching for the kids is an idiot, or is paid off.

show 1 reply