logoalt Hacker News

danielheathyesterday at 11:36 AM2 repliesview on HN

The fraud isn’t what he’s being punished for.

The ongoing refusal to answer questions under oath is.

He could have agreed to talk anytime and been released shortly.


Replies

pc86yesterday at 4:38 PM

I understand being in contempt for not answering a question generally, but I'm curious how this doesn't fall under 5th amendment protections.

show 1 reply
superkuhyesterday at 3:02 PM

It sure would be nice if this standard of conduct in court were also upheld for the US federal officials who refuse to answer or straight up bold faced lie in court. But nah, it only ever happens to normal people.