>a) working memory (hold & manipulate information in mind simultaneously)

What counts as 'in mind' is undefined. You can succeed by declaring anything manipulatable counts as in.

>c) fluid intelligence (ability to reason through novel problems without relying on prior knowledge)

reasoning presupposes the conclusion. Solve is better. When a solution is given you cannot declare it to be not a solution. People can and do argue about if a answer was arrived at by reasoning even when they agree on the correctness.

>g) spatial / visuospatial reasoning (mental rotation, visualization, navigating abstract spatial relationships)

I have aphantasia, why should you exclude something from being intelligent because it cannot do something that I also cannot do.