Not one of these efforts emulate <blink />. I want my money back.
These are awesome! I’d love to use some of these for my solitaire game.
Weird thing when I preview one of the backgrounds then scroll down the page on mobile the images disappear. I have to refresh the page to view all the backgrounds again after selecting one.
I wonder if you should add names for the patterns so we can pick favorites?
The notice about having "access" to the backgrounds is sticky, and takes up one third of the screen on mobile with no way to remove it . . . Why?
Those are excellent! The orange shingles are my favorite. Though I think some of them are not working on Firefox; the blue and green vortices are rendered as a single blue rectangle and a single green hexagon.
I wonder how people are using them in a way that is not distracting to the main content. I've found that high-frequency patterns (small details with sharp transitions) can be a bit distracting, but I haven't found a good solution that doesn't compromise the beauty of the backgrounds.
I find it odd that there's a custom of blurring or obscuring exactly the thing I'm interested in when I show interest in it by mousing over it.
Great idea man, must be pulling in some good SEO traffic as well.
Each one can be copied as inline SVG or CSS using the background-image property with a data URI. Most are under 1KB.
This is very cool but hasn’t it been around for like a decade?
These are beautiful, thank you for sharing. I really like the one with the triangles, was it inspired by Rule 30?
This is top notch, great work!
I'm a sucker for this kind of stuff, but I'm usually disappointed after clicking the link. These on the other hand are excellent, and that they have configurable options like stroke, color, etc is gravy on the top. Thanks for sharing!
this is exactly what i needed
What is your authoring tool for SVG?
The SVG code is well written. It is neither Adobe bloat-spam-slop and neither is it overly SVGOMG'd.
For picky SVG people you could have some easy way to present the code. Only a minority value quality SVG, artworkers do not look at SVG code and coders just see SVG as 'assets' from the artworker. SVG therefore has not evolved to a full art form.
[flagged]
I am very confused by the comments, they seem too excited for this... Are they real or paid bots? If they are real, kudos to OP