logoalt Hacker News

Show HN: Tmux-IDE, OSS agent-first terminal IDE

59 pointsby thijsverreckyesterday at 5:46 PM31 commentsview on HN

Hey HN,

Small OSS project that i created for myself and want to share with the community. It's a declarative, scriptable, terminal-based IDE focussed on agentic engineering.

That's a lot of jargon, but essentially its a multi-agent IDE that you start in your terminal.

Why is that relevant? Thanks to tmux and SSH, it means that you have a really simple and efficient way to create your own always-on coding setup.

Boot into your IDE through ssh, give a prompt to claude and close off your machine. In tmux-ide claude will keep working.

The tool is intentionally really lightweight, because I think the power should come from the harnesses that you are working with.

I'm hoping to share this with the community and get feedback and suggestions to shape this project! I think that "remote work" is directionally correct, because we can now have extremely long-running coding tasks. But I also think we should be able to control and orchstrate that experience according to what we need.

The project is 100% open-source, and i hope to shape it together with others who like to work in this way too!

Github: https://github.com/wavyrai/tmux-ide Docs: https://tmux.thijsverreck.com/docs


Comments

quanwinnyesterday at 7:55 PM

I'm so married to my existing tmux workflows and layout that I'm not sure whether I'd ever feel open to trying out something like this. At the same time, orchestrating multiple agents with native tmux and git worktree does feel cumbersome.

show 3 replies
theturtletalksyesterday at 6:32 PM

I'm also trying to build something similar for agent orchestration where one terminal is controlling multiple terminals. I tried using tmux but it's very good at sending the initial text to the tmux sessions, but I've not been able to get an agent to have a proper back and forth controlling multiple tmux sessions. I know we can use send-keys, but reading the session or knowing when that session is complete is kind of up in the air. And then if the main orchestrator terminal has checked all the sessions to see if they're actually working and doing things, the main session kind of stop so I've kind of been thinking about a cron that periodically checks in and nudges it to check the sessions again. Are they still working? Do they need more guidance? Essentially having one terminal control others, but having that back and forth with the terminals has been pretty challenging to achieve. Have you gotten anywhere with this?

show 2 replies
behrlichyesterday at 10:12 PM

https://github.com/ehrlich-b/wingthing Here’s my take on this idea, also FOSS. Does tmux style sessions so you can come and go. It also exposes a web terminal so you can get remote access - but you can also run fully locally for less latency.

bwestergardyesterday at 6:22 PM

Looks like a great implementation. I want to question the basic user story, which seems to be: "I am a software developer who wants to improve productivity by running multiple simultaneous agents that are roughly isomorphic to a human software developer team."

I am burning a lot of tokens every day at work and on personal projects. It's helpful. I generally work in tmux with github copilot in one pane, and a few other terminal panes showing tests and current diff.

I find it really important to avoid the temptation to multi-task by running multiple agents. For quite varied tasks, productivity gains from multi-tasking have proven to be illusory. Why would it be different with writing software?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_multitasking

operatingthetanyesterday at 8:15 PM

If this supported Gemini and Codex I would find it useful. I never run more than one Claude, it's always a mix.

show 1 reply
selixe_yesterday at 8:40 PM

Interesting, but I wonder if this shifts too much complexity onto the user.

tmux is powerful, but not exactly approachable, and "multi-agent orchestration" on top of it feels like something that could get hard to reason about quickly. Curious how you think about UX here.

show 2 replies
0daymanyesterday at 7:51 PM

https://cmux.com/

show 1 reply
garymiklosyesterday at 6:39 PM

I built a very similar one that I use every day, smux: https://github.com/gergomiklos/smux. Took only 1 hour with claude.

devcraft41yesterday at 8:43 PM

Terminal-first makes a lot of sense for anything that runs on remote servers. I've been on helix+tmux for about a year and the main friction is onboarding teammates who are VSCode-native. Nice to see projects pushing in this direction. Does it handle multi-pane debugging or is that still a manual tmux split?

cyrusradfaryesterday at 7:51 PM

Congrats on getting this out. What was the most surprising part of the build?

show 1 reply
mlbossyesterday at 7:33 PM

Can somebody develop a mobile app that natively supports tmux

show 3 replies
jamesvzbyesterday at 9:11 PM

open source alternatives are catching up fast. give it 6 months

ekropotinyesterday at 8:03 PM

So basically tmuxinator?

desireco42yesterday at 9:48 PM

Thank you for sharing your work. Really cool.

From my perspective, this is cool, but since tmux is kind of permanent, you open your layout, set 1,2,3 screens for agents, you might add gemini and opencode. then open vite for server and one for shell for example. Then you can just close it and reopen whenever you want to work on it.

And that is it. If I am missing something, processes taking memory or such, I have a machine with memory (I know, flexing how expensive things are), please explain.

AtxWrk70yesterday at 8:48 PM

the token costs are real. we switched to smaller models for 80% of tasks and barely noticed

aplomb1026yesterday at 11:32 PM

[dead]