logoalt Hacker News

strbeanyesterday at 11:36 PM2 repliesview on HN

> Or, we could zone areas to encourage people to live in towns where it's feasible for both corporations and the government to provide infrastructure and services at a reasonable cost.

This is assuming there isn't a good reason why we might want some percentage of the population to be rural. To have farms and ranches, for example.


Replies

TulliusCicerotoday at 12:00 AM

Sure, if we restrict the subsidy to farmers and others where we need them to live in rural areas, that's fine.

show 1 reply
iknowstufftoday at 1:19 AM

Farmers and ranches don’t need any more incentive to live there on top of the boatload of money they make selling their produce