logoalt Hacker News

pylualast Tuesday at 11:45 PM7 repliesview on HN

I’m actually okay with not letting under age people use e2e. I’m not okay with blocking everyone. I have 2 kids.


Replies

whatshisfacelast Tuesday at 11:59 PM

I'm not comfortable with the idea that children's private messages would be exposed to thousands of social media workers and government employees.

foursidelast Tuesday at 11:49 PM

I understand the concern but then to make this available for adults you now have to provide proof of age to companies, which opens up another can of privacy worms.

show 2 replies
triceratopsyesterday at 12:05 AM

I have kids. I don't want creeps and predators spying on their conversations with friends.

show 2 replies
newscrackeryesterday at 2:45 AM

In a way, this is like saying that one trusts total strangers in some random large tech company and total strangers in government agencies to read and/or manipulate conversations that kids have. This also paves the way to disallow E2EE for other classes of people based on arbitrary criteria. I don’t believe this is good for society overall.

show 1 reply
noosphryesterday at 12:18 AM

You just need to provide the government with your name and address and the name and address of the counter party every time you send an encrypted message.

If you don't support this you're obviously a pedo nazi terrorist.

show 1 reply
usr1106yesterday at 7:11 AM

There is no reason kids should use so called smart devices, except making certain companies richer. Kids have had a healthy development without such crap for thousands of years. We don't discuss what percentage of alcohol should be allowed in beer and wine for kids.

show 1 reply
hsbauauvhabzblast Tuesday at 11:49 PM

The problem is all these ‘for the children’ arguments contain collateral damage.

show 3 replies