alt Hacker NewsI think it's more important to pin down where a human must be in order for this not to become a mess. Or have we skipped that step entirely?
I think it's more important to pin down where a human must be in order for this not to become a mess. Or have we skipped that step entirely?
Personally my theory is that to solve the messiness we will need some new frameworks and even languages that are designed to catch AI mistakes in large code bases. For example, AIs in the past would sometimes hallucinate methods that do not exist. But in a language with a strong type system a static type checker should be able to catch that mistake and give the AI automated feedback to fix that mistake without a human in the loop.
As far as humans in the loop, the only human we ultimately cannot get rid of is the user. But I think with a combo of user feedback forms and automated metrics we can give AI a lot of feedback about how good software is just from users using the software.