alt Hacker NewsYou've said shat I meant to say more eloquently. That's my point. The bar owner can possess the information about their own bar without problem. The issue is when they share it with others, voluntarily or under coercion.
You've said shat I meant to say more eloquently. That's my point. The bar owner can possess the information about their own bar without problem. The issue is when they share it with others, voluntarily or under coercion.
No you still don't get it, the bar owner can share the information with whoever he likes.
The government, does not own the country, it's not "their bar".