logoalt Hacker News

JumpCrisscrossyesterday at 11:14 PM1 replyview on HN

> while there have been a few noticeable rejections, such as the tariff ruling, its been a majority of heads he wins, tails his opponent loses, with this court

While "the Supreme Court overwhelmingly sided with the Trump administration," it has been far from the "control" rhetoric posited above. Most of this was on the emergency docket. Major cases have been decided against Trump, from reimbursements for DOGE cancellations to restricting Trump's use of the Alient Enemiest Act and National Guard [1].

Those notables are not consistent with a fascist court, but a very right-wing one. Between those two are a lot of ground.

[1] https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/01/looking-back-at-2025-the-...


Replies

lovichtoday at 3:21 AM

> Those notables are not consistent with a fascist court, but a very right-wing one. Between those two are a lot of ground.

That’s an opinion you can have but that I don’t share. I also would posit that the current SCOTUS thinks they still can maintain control while ceding further and further power to an imperial presidency when Trump is in charge.

The existence of some major cases being decided against Trump when the majority have been decided for him and the opposite logic is applied to presidents on the other side, are only part of why this current conservative government keeps checking off the 14 points of ur-fascism