logoalt Hacker News

qha34htoday at 2:15 AM5 repliesview on HN

I don't see how these glasses are legal at all. While filming in public places is allowed in the US, commercial use of that material is not. For example, you cannot just use public material with recognizable people in advertisements without their consent.

Meta is likely to use material from these spy devices to build real world networks and use it commercially.

These "glasses" should be outlawed. The only useful purpose is to immediately identify the wearer as an asshole.


Replies

sebmellentoday at 2:29 AM

Is it really true that commercial use of film taken from public places is not allowed without consent? Is there a case law or a specific statute on this? Would love to read more.

show 2 replies
paxystoday at 2:35 AM

So should smartphone cameras be illegal as well? Or cameras of every kind?

show 1 reply
dataflowtoday at 2:25 AM

Are all commercial uses illegal or only those that display your likeness?

show 1 reply
DoneWithAllThattoday at 12:13 PM

> I don't see how these glasses are legal at all. While filming in public places is allowed in the US, commercial use of that material is not

As a general statement about the law this is not correct. And that’s even before we get to the next paragraph where you just wildly speculate and use that as buttressing the already false premise.

justkystoday at 12:25 PM

[dead]