alt Hacker News> mean, do you also consider it "authoritarian" to have e.g. regulations on vehicle exhaust?
In the US this is why so many wagons have turned into SUVs which have more lax fuel efficiency requirements. They find ways around the regulations.
All Apple laptops have hard soldered SSDs. SSDs have to go bad eventually.
Should the government force apple to only sell laptops with replaceable ssds ?
The most environmentally friendly laptop is a used Thinkpad. But I respect others have a right to buy what they want.
Back to the original point, the laptop isn’t even hard to fix. OP just didn’t do there research.
One country did a bad job with regulations, therefore regulation as a whole is useless? Anyway, the question was if you consider it authoritarian, not whether the particular legislation in your particular country was successful.
Should the government force Apple to sell laptops with replaceable SSDs? Perhaps. What's the upside of having to desolder it when it goes bad? What's the upside of riveting the keyboard to the frame?
You're also dodging the question of my right to buy vegetables with high levels of PFAS and drink water with high levels of lead.
> Back to the original point, the laptop isn’t even hard to fix. OP just didn’t do [their] research.
The original point was never whether some guy did a good job fixing his laptop or not, but rather whether there's any point to riveting the keyboard, and more generally, whether it's worth defending companies' "rights" to sell intentionally crippled products and pollute the environment.