He argued against putting things in a spectrum in many instances where that would be wrong, including the case under the question. What's your argument against that idea? LLM'ed too much lately?
He argued against and the response presented a counterargument. Both were based around social costs and used the same wording (ie "everything").
You made a specious dismissal. Now you're making personal attacks. Perhaps it's actually you who is having difficulty reasoning properly here?
He argued against and the response presented a counterargument. Both were based around social costs and used the same wording (ie "everything").
You made a specious dismissal. Now you're making personal attacks. Perhaps it's actually you who is having difficulty reasoning properly here?