logoalt Hacker News

zerryesterday at 3:50 PM3 repliesview on HN

6+ months' notice with a severance package equal to at least an annual salary.


Replies

dparkyesterday at 4:20 PM

Why would you give someone 6 months notice? What good is that for the employee? Especially if the severance is generous.

“Hey, we’re going to fire you in 6 months. Just a heads up.”

Nah. Give me the year of salary and send me home today. Better for the employee and for the company than pointlessly dragging it out. Again, this is assuming generous severance.

show 2 replies
HomeDeLaPotyesterday at 6:40 PM

Giving any kind of notice about layoffs while expecting employees to continue working is just bad for everyone.

The employees stress out about whether they're going to be impacted. Nobody gets much work done as they update their resumes and prepare for the worst. The best people start looking for other opportunities and find them. If specific employees are told they're going to be laid off, some seek revenge.

Much better to immediately notify those impacted, revoke their access, give them generous severance instead of expecting them to work, and let everyone else know they're safe.

show 1 reply
emmpyesterday at 5:09 PM

6 months notice + 12 months salary, which is what you are proposing, seems strictly worse to me than just 18 months salary and no notice.