logoalt Hacker News

MeetingsBrowseryesterday at 10:48 PM1 replyview on HN

In the hypothetical scenario where car seats have only downsides, then of course I’m against a mandate.

There is a difference between cherry picking studies that back up your view point and how medical experts set policy though.

Experts review all of the data, and ignore outliers like a paper published in a law journal that suggests car seats are the primary reason families have shrunk from having three to two kids since the 80’s


Replies

kortillatoday at 7:02 AM

You’ve funnily proven the point of how willing people are to put immense burdens on others in the name of safety.

There is a non-zero amount of deaths the car seat law would prevent. The burden will discourage larger families and will contribute to population decline far larger than the lives saved.

You’re not only arguing for it, you’re doing it in a way as if preventing death is such an obvious single dimension to optimize that you’re calling people irrational because they are against something that reduces fatalities.

Your same argument is what leads to prohibition and a long list of other things that suck the color out of life in the interest of “safety”.