OpenAI is a few years behind Anthropic, and it's unlikely they'll catch up at this point.
I'm following this very closly and i'm stunned. Any infos on why you think they are behind antrophic in years?
I do see less quality from reasoning at chatgpt compared to Gemini but otherwise i'm not seeing a year or years gap.
They’re about even in general, but for me OpenAI is slightly or significantly ahead in the areas I care about the most. E.g. claude code is a backend slop cannon if you don’t tell codex/gemini to review the outputs.
Anthropic is _unquestionably_ ahead product wise because of their agentic coding tools, but they are not _years_ ahead. In particular, their advantage is in the harness, which is not hard to replicate!
Where exactly are they behind?