>I doubt you even took the time to read the investigation done by The Guardian.

It did not address your claim at all.

>The onus of evidence is on the person that initially claimed the 40k number.

No, that is not how the burden of proof works. It is not in the context of all things said in all time. You said it was false in this conversation, you support that assertion.

>You have made zero attempt to support yours.

I don't have a claim.

You don't seem to understand the terms I'm using here so this is probably not productive to continue.