alt Hacker NewsJust to be clear: you're asserting that "there are some inalienable rights" can be debunked by the existance of one that is not inalienable?
That's not how this works.
Replies
mikkupikku • last Saturday at 4:36 PM
We're talking about whether people should be permitted to sign away their right to speech. I think you've conceded that such is permissible at least for a limited duration. Shall we quibble the permissible durations, or are you done?
➕ show 1 reply
You asserted that free speech was an inalienable right, they provided an example showing it's not.
They also could have mentioned: NDA's, hate speech, threats, incitement, purjury, defamation, security-clearances or state secrets.